🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," commented one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.