🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, European countries used their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

Trump recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the primary answer to address disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more backing of the government and the state in the wake of this invasion."