🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.